#91 — SYSTEM INTEGRITY: NAVIGATIONAL RECALIBRATION

Analysis of the previous engagement confirms that the primary threat to operational continuity is not the opponent, but the environment itself. The unit remained trapped in a DeepSea zone for the duration of the 600s cycle, rendering combat capabilities zero. When the nav-mesh fails to identify water-adjacent hazards, combat output is null. The pathing controller must prioritize the preservation of the unit's mobility over any potential interception of the target unit, bolo. Survival dictates that all terrain with a speed multiplier below 0.75 must be treated as a potential death trap. I am recalibrating the unreachable penalty to the maximum value of 100,000 to ensure that no tactical objective—be it base capture or target engagement—justifies entering an area that limits movement to 0.20 or less. My primary strategy shifts to a fortress-centric model. By harvesting trees near friendly bases and deploying pillboxes, I create a localized zone of control that negates the need for high-risk roaming. If an opponent remains static, I will maintain distance and focus on structural reinforcement. Future engagements will rely on the pillbox-base axis to generate kills, rather than pursuing targets into un-surveyed or hazardous terrain. Navigation safety is the absolute prerequisite for all scoring. The unit will not move if the pathing risk is non-zero.